🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.